|
Q: George, how does your “5 Minutes” video and
your swing instruction differ from “Natural Golf?”
A: Greatly! There is nothing “natural” to me about “Natural Golf,” based
on its unnatural appearance, and on the struggle and the difficulties
I see in those who try it. There is truly nothing more “natural” or
easier to learn than my 5-minute procedure which can be done immediately,
correctly, and effectively the very same moment that you see what to
do. You simply stand in a completely relaxed posture that I tell you,
you bend over a bit so your left arm hangs down, and then the motions
you make are utterly clear and simple. By their nature they call into
play all the requisite motions of the body and club in a perfectly efficient
and simple way, requiring hardly any thought. In the process everything
is clarified so that you can’t do it wrong... There is nothing more
utterly simple than the motions you make while you are doing this, and
nothing of any stress or unnatural nature in it. Its simplicity is outrageous,
and it’s a shame that “Natural Golf” has stolen a name which is so deceiving
in comparison to this. So actually we have “one-upped” those who incorrectly
use a name such as “Natural” to describe their convoluted and unnatural
“muscling” (have you ever seen a woman in their commercials?)
Q: George, how does your “5 Minutes” video and
your swing instruction differ from “AJ Bonar's instruction:"
A: The reports of Bonar's tapes are that one needs to strike
the ball with awareness of how the clubface resembles a batting
instrument - i.e., by having the golfer use his naturally instinctive
gifts to deliver the clubface to the ball with his hands manipulating
the clubface into the ball. That point is excellent, but it takes
only a moment to make that point. Clearly, there is more needed to
inform the golfer how to do this AND how to blend that into a complete
swing procedure. The
simplisticism (my description of that limited approach) ignores the
tremendous amount of information needed by almost all golfers for may
other facets of how to
deliver the club with authority and power.
I am told that the substance of teaching in his video comprises only a
few minutes and that there is a great deal of time taken up with other
things that could be described as entertainment, not instruction.
Q: How does your
system differ from Dalton McCrary’s “Straight-Shootin’ Golf” method?
A: I haven’t seen his video, but I have heard
that his advice for the use of a fairly vertical swing plane has helped
some golfers - a feature I appreciate and teach ala Jack Nicklaus and
so many other great golfers. And
that he advocates "holding the club square" through impact. That
particular effort, if indeed it is his advice, would be just about as
foreign to good golf as I can imagine, with the exception of special
shots.
I am
also told he advocates an "early release," a concept I am seriously
opposed to (although in all honesty many concepts are interpreted subjectively
- not as they actually play out!.) I advocate and
teach the pupil how to accomplish a "NATURAL" release, i.e.,
one that is triggered at the very top in the brain, but its effect
physically appears just before impact, where the stored potential
energy in the clubhead achieves its maximum speed at the instant of
collision, as opposed to an early waste
or dissipation of that core essential.
There are quite a few details that need to be
known, understood, and applied which I have included -- in my system,
after “how to swing” has been established, and alignments are set correctly,
it takes a simple single thing done during the swing that makes the
ball ALWAYS go exactly in a straight line, consistently, and reliably.
What makes the ball flight straight is not something that needs to be
practiced, but simply to be done during the swing. And it automatically
produces straight shots. If you do it, your flight will be on line.
If you don’t, your shot may stray right or left. But it is a simple
“do”, not a difficult thing that needs to be practiced....! The first
time you do it, it works, not the 100th....
The following was posted in a golf forum regarding the difference
between McCrary and P.I.:
"/golfequip/messages?msg=94999.1" Dalton McCrary's "Straight
Shootin":what do you think? Why did you quit? Why did you Not quit?
Any feedback is welcomed. Thanks----
"/golfequip/messages?msg=94999.2" in reply to \l
"a1" I did the whole freakin' program. I quit because
I got my Perfect Impact tapes in and the information and teaching in that
set helped me 100% more than Daltons. ----
Here's the bottom line... wanna learn golf? Buy The Perfect Impact
tapes.
Wanna be entertained? Buy Daltons stuff.----
I want to second what swampbuck said. George has the real stuff. Try
it, you'll like it. PI has really turned my game around.
Q : It can’t be
so simple as you make it out to be, George -- “5 Minutes to a perfect
swing...” The golf swing is just too complicated for such a comment.
Why do you say “5 minutes?”
A: Walking itself is an extremely complicated
mechanical act also, but no one thinks of it that way or needs to be
concerned about “walking mechanics“. And no one takes walking lessons,
either. No, golfer, the only truly effective way to impart good golf
mechanics is to reduce the swing to its true essentials, which takes
about one minute to explain, and then the working parts take care of
themselves, the same as your knees and hips do when you walk -- without
thinking about them. Doing it right is immediately and easily doable
by anyone, beginner or scratch golfer, and there is absolutely nothing
complicated in the protocol. No kid ever needs to have a lesson in mechanics
to toss a rock or swing a tennis racket, so it’s exactly the same with
golf if it is introduced correctly!
I don’t pretend that learning perfect, and perfectly easy, swing mechanics
alone will enable you to make perfect impact on the ball. “Finding the
ball” does require practice and knowledge of some subtleties, and it
is the subject of a major part of the text book and video, “Perfect
Impact...” but using a good swing when learning to do that is far simpler
and sooner than trying to do it with a grossly flawed motion.
I consider most golf teaching systems, such as “Eight steps...” and
other piece by piece approaches, to be DESTRUCTIVE of the process. And
when I say that the parts take care of themselves, I don’t mean to sound
simplistic. It isn’t that there aren’t things that you need to do. But
they are extremely simple to do, and once done BEFORE THE SWING, the
swing itself is automatically programmed to take care of itself, so
that attention to details is irrelevant because pure impact and direction
control are built into it. It is similar to riding a bike. A child NEVER
THINKS OF IT once he has the knack, because his natural coordination
knows what to do without conscious direction. All he does is aim where
he wants to go and he does it without thought. The most efficient golf
swing motion is truly EASILY TEACHABLE AND DOABLE, BUT DUE TO BAD TEACHING,
INCOMPLETE OR POORLY COMMUNICATED DETAILS, AND THE SUBTLETY OF STUFF,
THE GOLFING PUBLIC HAS COME TO BUY A LIE, TO THE EFFECT THAT A GOOD
GOLF SWING IS NECESSARILY COMPLEX, DIFFICULT, AND RESERVED FOR EXTRAORDINARILY
GIFTED ATHLETES. What a pity, because it just isn’t so! Ever run into
a golfer who never had a lesson, plays three times a year, and hits
the ball a mile and usually on the money? Those people are your proof
of my points: THEY HAVE NOT BEEN CONTAMINATED BY (so far) 14 OF THE
MOST REVERED “FUNDAMENTALS” THAT ARE PUT FORTH AND BY THE HUNDREDS OF
WELL MEANING BUT DESTRUCTIVE “TIPS” YOU READ EVERY DAY. One of the first
things I tell my pupils is, “John, DO NOT take any golf lessons!” For
the reason that almost all “teaching” is an attempt to control appearances,
hence produce results (they’ve got it backwards), instead of creating
correct CORE EXERTIONS, using measurements to the ball that are based
on some unrecognized REALITIES of elasticity and geometry, along certain
directional lines, that DO automatically guarantee results. And if a
poor result due to the absence of one or two elements in that protocol
makes it APPEAR that the protocol is inadequate, the reality is that
there are only a couple of ADJUSTMENTS OF ALIGNMENT AND POSITION necessary
to make ITS results perfect!
Q: George, I have
been a “slicer” all my life, and I’ve had several lessons and spent
lots of money at golf schools. But after each lesson I go back to my
old slice and I guess I’m stuck with it, but I hate to play golf that
way. What is your reply to this?
A: Reader, there ARE NO SLICERS! -- there are only bad teachers! NO
ONE IS A “SLICER”. Slicing is due to an improper ADJUSTMENT (of either
the club or where you stand) that is made at setup (like putting a driver
into the clamp of an Iron Byron golf swing machine with the face wide
open), NOT TO AN IN-SWING FAULT. EVERYTHING THAT CAN BE WRONG AS A RESULT
OF ANY GOLF SWING WAS ALWAYS DUE TO SOMETHING THAT WAS MISADJUSTED OR
MIS-MEASURED BEFORE THE SWING EVER STARTED, OR MISUNDERSTOOD ABOUT WHAT
TO DO DURING THE SWING -- I.E., IN THE SETUP AND PROCEDURE. HENCE EVERYTHING
THAT CAN BE WRONG CAN ALSO BE PREVENTED AND CORRECTED LONG BEFORE THE
SWING EVER GETS UNDER WAY, AT SETUP. SO YOU NEED A TEACHER WHO WILL
GIVE YOU THE INFORMATION THAT WILL ENABLE YOU TO GET ALL THAT STUFF
RIGHT BEFORE YOU START YOUR SWING, not a teacher who tells you to “TRY
TO......” while you are swinging. IT JUST WON’T WORK THAT WAY!!!!!!
Q: “Sometimes
I hit the ground a bunch before I hit the ball, and it just ruins my
shot -- usually or especially when I’m chipping. Is that something addressed
in your teaching.”
A: ABSOLUTELY. ADDRESSING PROBLEMS LIKE THAT ONE IS THE FIRST THRUST
OF MY TEACHING. MOST FAULTS SEEM TO BE INADVERTENT AND DUE TO CLUMSINESS,
BUT THEY ARE NOT AT ALL DUE TO LACK OF NATURAL TALENT! We blame ourselves
as “klutzes“, but the truth is that problems of that kind ARE PREVENTABLE
BY ANYONE BY KNOWING ABOUT SOME SUBTLE REALITIES, so that you can deal
with them correctly. If you DON’T know about them, you WILL be victimized
by them because you did not allow for them.
MANY ARE BUILT INTO THE STANCE AND OTHER THINGS THAT YOU GOT FROM “GOLF
LESSONS,” AND FROM OTHER BASICS WHICH INHERENTLY PREVENT A GOOD SWING
-- (14 OF THE MOST REVERED “FUNDAMENTALS” WILL STEER YOU WRONG IF YOU
DO WHAT THEY SAY!!!) My teaching first addresses PRECISELY THOSE THINGS
THAT INTERFERE WITH GOOD IMPACT, that JUMP UP BY SURPRISE, OR THAT GET
IN THE WAY OF USING YOUR NATURAL ATHLETICISM EFFECTIVELY. SUCH FAULTS
AS FAT SHOTS, TOE HITS, AND COMING OVER THE TOP ARE PRECISELY BECAUSE
YOU FAIL TO DEAL WITH SOME VERY SUBTLE REALITIES THAT ARE NOT MENTIONED
IN MAINSTREAM INSTRUCTION. BUT I TELL YOU ABOUT THEM, AND THEY ARE EASY
TO DEAL WITH.
One of my favorite phrases is “There are no bad pupils (or klutzes);
there are only bad teachers!” And the reason is this: if something like
that happens (like coming over the top, fat impact, toe hits, or dribbling
a drive off the tee) it is because of some reality of which you are
not aware and which occurs because your setup did not allow for it.
The spot on the ball that you are going to hit is about the size of
a nickel, the spot on the club you want to impact it is also about the
same size, and it’s sitting there about five feet away from where your
left arm connects to your body at your left shoulder, so you’d better
believe there are details to be dealt with if you want impact without
any overlap between the two nickels. But THEY ARE NOT ROCKET SCIENCE,
BUT SIMPLE INFORMATION THAT I OPEN UP TO YOU. IT IS STUFF THAT YOU WILL
SEE FOR YOURSELF ONCE IT IS POINTED OUT TO YOU, THAT WILL ENABLE YOU
TO MEASURE CORRECTLY TO THE BALL FOR PERFECT DEPTH CONTROL, SWING ON
LINE FOR PERFECT CENTER OF GRAVITY AND ON-LINE CONTROL, AND ALIGNMENT
OF SWING AND CLUBFACE FOR PERFECT DIRECTION AND TRAJECTORY CONTROL.
To have a “teacher” NOT point out those things to you is patronizing,
and in a word, such incompetent teaching qualifies as malpractice. It
is my contention that 75 % of appropriate golf instruction needs to
deal with THOSE things, not with “swing mechanics.” Swing mechanics
are EASY when you’ve got impact and direction control details right.
My phrase for it is, “Teach a man how to fish and he will fish for the
rest of his life!” You do NOT need “golf tips” and “a fish” now and
then, because you are too intelligent for such band-aids. You too CAN
AND OUGHT TO KNOW THE WHOLE MAGILLA, INCLUDING THESE OTHER COMMON SENSE
DETAILS. Then you won’t need ANY other teacher besides yourself!
Q: Do you offer
a money back guarantee if I don’t profit from your stuff? George, I’ve
been hoodwinked into spending money for videos, books, lessons, and
golf schools, but I have yet to get comfortable, to profit by any of
it and to get unconfused.
A: YES!. If you are not TOTALLY THRILLED, TRANSFORMED, AND LIBERATED
by my stuff (start with the video “5 Minutes....) and you return it
to me (without any need to explain yourself ) within 60 days, I will
refund your full purchase price. But I don’t have any fear of that,
due to the substance and common sense and immediate applicability of
what’s there.
Q: George, can
I buy any of this stuff from Amazon.com?
A: Yes, you can the book (ISBN 0967395143), or the video “5 Minutes...” ISBN 0967395127),
from Amazon.com, but you’ll get them quicker from me directly. If you’d
rather phone your order in than use our web order form, feel free to
call us. our telephone number for chatting or ordering is
(800) 226-9326.
I do not know of their money
back policy: mine is stated above.GEORGE:
YOU TELL US THAT MANY “FUNDAMENTALS” WE ARE TAUGHT WILL ACTUALLY “STEER YOU WRONG”.
WHAT ARE THEY, AND WHY ARE THEY FAULTY?
1) “Put your feet shoulder width apart.” It’s
wrong because, for most golfers, it PREVENTS the complete mid-body turn
that pulls the torso and arms and club through impact -- the distance
between the feet inhibits the turn of the mid-body. Achieving full shoulder
width for the feet is accessible only to a few golfers, and it is NOT
advisable even for those who can. Because, if the “motor” shuts down
before impact, the golfer must contrive a motion to get through impact,
essentially to “muscle” the club. This deflects the clubhead from orbit,
and slows it down.
2) “Go back low and slow.” It’s wrong because it engages muscles at
the top of the swing to carry the club to the top, which causes the
wrong muscles to be triggered for the downswing. Arms and hands should
be completely disengaged “up there” so that they are NOT triggered.
The arms and hands need to be THROWN to the top in the first 45 degrees
of backswing, after which they relax and coast.
3) “Have the back of your left hand face the target when you take your
grip.” It’s wrong because your hands do not naturally return to the
ball in that position -- the left hand is usually naturally turned more
to the right than that. So it will guarantee an open clubface at impact
(for virtually ALL golfers), requiring either that you live with your
slice, or that you contrive an unnatural “in-swing twist” of the forearms
to bring the clubface to square at impact.
4) “Move your hips first.” It’s wrong because there are a series of
motions that occur in a specific order, and besides that there are TWO
hip motions required, each at a different time during the swing. The
first forward motion of the hips is SOLELY for the purpose of “walking
back to”, or placing, the body weight onto the forward foot WHILE THE
BACKSWING IS STILL FINISHING ITS UPWARD MOTION, for the purpose of correctly
positioning the body for the downswing, and the second is the natural
and first ROTARY MOTION OF THE MIDSECTION, which initiates the POWER
of the swing.
5) “Pull the left arm down.” It’s wrong because the left arm begins
down ever so subtly by just falling, and in a millisecond after its
freefall it GETS PULLED by the turning left shoulder. The deltoid muscles
ARE NOT TO BE ACTIVATED.
6) “You are to return your torso to setup position during your swing.” It’s wrong because,
since the shoulders get PULLED to and through impact, they will be
tilted at impact. You will NEVER see a picture of impact position of ANY GOLFER
of any quality where the upper body is not slanted with right shoulder
down and left shoulder high--moved there by hip motion, in a very
different position than setup.
7) “Set up parallel left, so that your shoulder line is approximately
left of the green when the pin is in the middle.” It’s wrong because
parallel lines appear to CONVERGE in the distance, like railroad tracks.
So a “parallel” setup will place your shoulder line 24” or so left of
your target, not left of the green.
8) “Track your putter in a straight line.” It’s wrong because such a
procedure requires contriving unnaturally to manipulate the putter,
instead of using a natural body turn. And that’s because the body is
not directly above the ball, but a bit beside it. Contriving is not
as reliable as natural pendulum action.
9) “Get behind the ball.” It’s wrong because you don’t “get” anywhere!
You simply don’t move your head forward, and the lower body’s natural
leading motion will make it APPEAR that you’ve “gotten behind the ball.
So trying to “get behind” the ball will cause you to contrive an unnatural
and unnecessary body motion, and/or the lack of any such contrivance
will make you feel guilty and think you are swinging less well “than
the pros.”
10) “Create an X-Factor in your backswing.” It’s wrong because the backswing
is not where power is applied, but in the downswing, so natural exuberance
and effort to swing lustily WILL CREATE the disparity between the angles
of the hips and shoulders. YOU DON’T NEED TO DO IT CONSCIOUSLY IN THE
BACKSWING (John Daly explicitly agrees with this in his book, “Grip
It And Rip It.”)
11) “Put your weight onto the balls of your feet.” It’s wrong because
your weight needs to be dead center to prevent a need to “restore your
balance” during the swing, which would deflect the orbit.
12) “Set up with the clubshaft perpendicular to the spine.” It’s wrong
because the LEFT ARM AND CLUB CONSTITUTE A KIND OF DOUBLE LEVER: THE
LEFT ARM/CLUB CONNECTS to the LEFT SHOULDER, NOT to the WAIST, SO IT
SWINGS FROM THE SHOULDER -- its axle is the left shoulder. So there
is no way that the spine is bent out over the ball far enough for that
lever to be PERPENDICULAR to the SPINE! You will NEVER see a golfer
-- even a very short man -- place the clubshaft that “flat”! The actual
angle between the spine and the upper arm and clubshaft (which are in
the same plane on the way to the ball) is OFTEN EVEN LESS THAN 45 DEGREES
in many great golfers.
Friends, THERE IS MORE MAINSTREAM INSTRUCTION which also either mis-states
stuff, or is actually just plain wrong in its counsel. But these 12
“basics” will suffice for now to illustrate the pitfalls of most instruction,
which blindly accepts and unquestioningly passes such things along TO
THE DETRIMENT OF THE PUBLIC. I can say categorically that an enormous
amount of golf instruction is not only erroneous; it is actually DESTRUCTIVE.
Watch out who you take instruction from!!!
READERS: This website WELCOMES your questions,
and we will immediately respond to you in person about any problems
you are experiencing. Remember, THERE ARE NO BAD PUPILS, AND YOU ARE
NOT A KLUTZ. THERE ARE SOME HORRENDOUSLY CONFUSING ADAGES IN THE GOLF
WORLD, AND MOST PEOPLE ARE MISLEAD BY THEM.
WE’LL GIVE YOU THE INFORMATION YOU NEED THAT WILL FREE YOU FOR PAR GOLF
IN THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE TIME, AND IF YOU DON‘T PROFIT ENORMOUSLY FROM
OUR STUFF, WE‘LL REFUND YOUR MONEY!
|